Comments on: H is for…

By: Merron Riddiford

Merron Riddiford — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:47:00 +0000

Hi Sharon
I have heaps of “H”s but comparatively few “S”s and “T’s.
Thats a good question you ask about the age of Thomas and Sarah, because they do look quite old. Thomas was 25 and if you take away the moustache he does look that age. Sarah on the other hand was 21 but looks heaps older. I think the hat shading her face doesn’t help. When I enlarge the photo I can see a younger person under the hat. When she was 60 she looked around 80. It is a nice photo and the only one I have of them together. There is a photo of Thomas in his later years on my Australia Day blog http://mywdfamilies.wordpress.com/2012/06/29/h-is-for/

By: Merron Riddiford

Merron Riddiford — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:38:14 +0000

Thanks GG. Thanks for running Family History through the Alphabet.

By: Merron Riddiford

Merron Riddiford — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:37:19 +0000

Thanks Fi. My database is sagging at “H”. I also forgot the Hughes, Head, Hazell, Harrison, Hall, Henry, Huggins & Haywood families and many more “H” names that are in-laws etc.

By: Sharon

Sharon — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:41:57 +0000

So many Hs. I have Hardly any.
I love the photo of Thomas Hadden and Sarah Harman. Just wondering how old they were?

By: Gould Genealogy

Gould Genealogy — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:23:33 +0000

Wow, so many connections to H names, places and words. Great post.

By: Fiona

Fiona — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:51:33 +0000

That’s a wHole lot of Hs! I’m particularly impressed by your apologies list.